What to model before you engage
Organisations that model ERP ROI before selecting a partner negotiate better contracts and set more realistic board expectations. The three inputs that move the number most are: total scope (modules, entities, integrations), data migration complexity, and the partner's billing model (fixed-fee versus time-and-materials).
For erp selection consultants, the starting point is understanding what the engagement covers. A software licence without a clear implementation scope is not a budget — it is the first line of one.
ROI model — working assumptions
Cost ranges are sourced from vendor documentation and public implementation data. They are ranges, not estimates for your specific situation — actual cost depends on entity count, data quality, integration scope, and the partner you select.
How to use this model
Take the low end of the cost range as your floor and the high end as your ceiling, then apply three adjustments: add 15–20% for change management and training if your organisation has not run an ERP programme before; add integration costs separately if you have a custom tech stack; and hold 10% contingency for scope changes discovered during data migration.
The result is a range, not a number. Present it to your steering committee as a range. A single-number budget for an ERP implementation is almost always wrong — the question is which direction it moves.
What an assessment covers
Our assessment is a structured evaluation of your situation: current-state systems, integration requirements, data quality, and timeline constraints. The output is a written scope document and a shortlist of three to five implementation partners ranked against your specific criteria — not a generic recommendation.
It takes two to three weeks and requires access to your finance and IT leads for a combined four to six hours. No software is sold in the process.